Comments on: Mac blogger toolkit – Northern Voice 2007 http://blog.stewtopia.com/2007/02/26/mac-blogger-toolkit-northern-voice-2007/ Randy Stewart Wed, 16 Jun 2010 22:02:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: marco http://blog.stewtopia.com/2007/02/26/mac-blogger-toolkit-northern-voice-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-7319 marco Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:24:12 +0000 http://blog.stewtopia.com/2007/02/26/mac-blogger-toolkit-northern-voice-2007/#comment-7319 browsershots seems like it's not really suited to the power QA person that needs to see it soon and make changes often. If you're really into it you should check out sitevista, resonably priced and there's no communal qeue. Also take a look at snagit, very good software for web page screenshots and quick cropping. browsershots seems like it’s not really suited to the power QA person that needs to see it soon and make changes often. If you’re really into it you should check out sitevista, resonably priced and there’s no communal qeue. Also take a look at snagit, very good software for web page screenshots and quick cropping.

]]> By: randy http://blog.stewtopia.com/2007/02/26/mac-blogger-toolkit-northern-voice-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-6684 randy Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:46:57 +0000 http://blog.stewtopia.com/2007/02/26/mac-blogger-toolkit-northern-voice-2007/#comment-6684 They work well together. I don't use QS to its fullest, but I can't recommend TextExpander highly enough. In some ways, I would equate TextExpander more with TextMate as it provides ways to type short commands/sentences and get a lot more out of that short bit. Currently, I only use QS as an application launcher, not for the myriad of other things that one could use it for. The best thing about both is that to do basic things, they both have small learning curves and quite a bit of room to grow. Hope that helps. Cheers, Randy Stewart They work well together. I don’t use QS to its fullest, but I can’t recommend TextExpander highly enough. In some ways, I would equate TextExpander more with TextMate as it provides ways to type short commands/sentences and get a lot more out of that short bit.

Currently, I only use QS as an application launcher, not for the myriad of other things that one could use it for.

The best thing about both is that to do basic things, they both have small learning curves and quite a bit of room to grow.

Hope that helps.

Cheers,
Randy Stewart

]]> By: Teresa Valdez Klein http://blog.stewtopia.com/2007/02/26/mac-blogger-toolkit-northern-voice-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-6606 Teresa Valdez Klein Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:17:53 +0000 http://blog.stewtopia.com/2007/02/26/mac-blogger-toolkit-northern-voice-2007/#comment-6606 Hi Stew! Thanks for coming by my blog the other day. So you still want Quicksilver, even after using TextExpander. I've heard the two are similar in terms of workflow expidition. Do you think you could use both simultaneously or are they mutually exclusive programs? Hi Stew! Thanks for coming by my blog the other day.

So you still want Quicksilver, even after using TextExpander. I’ve heard the two are similar in terms of workflow expidition. Do you think you could use both simultaneously or are they mutually exclusive programs?

]]>